International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

Evaluating the effectiveness of the Right to the City components to improve Sustainable Urban Spaces Quality for children

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Urban Development, Faculty of Civil, Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The Right to the City is based on all residents of the city enjoyment from the urban life opportunities.The Children Right to the City means that the public and social space and the general atmosphere of the city for the presence of children and interaction with the body of the city and other citizens should be provided.Alignment between sustainable principles and children's rights also clearly emphasizes on the need for paying attention to children in urban planning.This research is a developmental-applied research and to achieve the goals,a mixed research method has been used.In the qualitative part,the method of content analysis and Grounded theory method were used together and NVivo software was applied to code the data.In the qualitative studies,the statistical community includes experts as well as university professors in the field of urban planning,and 32 people have been selected as the research sample using the snowball technique.In the quantitative part,based on the results of the interview and the conceptual model obtained from the qualitative studies,a questionnaire based on the 5-point Likert scale was designed.To calculate the sample size,Cochran's formula and To analyze the results of the questionnaire and examine how the variables are related,SPSS statistical software,T-test and multivariate regression were used.Based on the results of qualitative studies,a conceptual model of the components of the concept of the right to the city was presented in order to improve the quality of sustainable urban spaces for children.Results of quantitative studies demonstrates the relationships between the variables and their impact coefficient and ranking.
Keywords

  • Aji, H. S., Budiyanti, R. B., & Djaja, K. (2016). The development of child-friendly integrated public spaces in settlement areas as an infrastructure of Jakarta. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, 210. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP160021
  • Boer, R. W. J., & de Vries, J. (2009). The right to the city as a tool for urban social movements: The case of Barceloneta. The 4th International Conference of the International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU), Amsterdam/Delf.
  • Brown, A. (2011). The ‘Right to the City’: From Paris 1968 to Rio 2010. Urban Knowledge in Cities of the South, 1-8.
  • Chawla, L. (2002). Evaluating children’s participation: Seeking areas of consensus. PLA Notes, 42, October. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
  • Chueca, E. G. (2017). What’s the right to the city? Inputs for the New Urban Agenda. Global Platform for the Right to the City.
  • Gilbert, H. (2016). Sustainability starts with children: Child-friendly precinct design for active travel and active play. University of South Australia.
  • Gill, T. (2019). Designing cities for outdoor play. In R. E. Tremblay, M. Boivin, & P. Rdev (Eds.), Encyclopedia on early childhood development.
  • Goldfeld, S., et al. (2020). Creating community indicators for early childhood development: Challenges and innovations from the kids in community’s study. Cities & Health, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2019.1596525
  • Habibi, M., & Amiri, M. (2015). The right to the city: The existing city and the desired city; What is and what should be. Iranian Journal of Anthropological Research (IJAR), 5(2), 9-30.
  • Hart, R. (1997). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. New York: UNICEF.
  • International Rescue Committee. (2017). Annual report.
  • Karbalaei Hosseini Ghiyasvand, A., & Soheili, J. (2013). Investigating the characteristics of a lovely city from the perspective of children (case study: two districts of Qazvin Municipality). Urban Studies Quarterly, No. 9, pp. 68.
  • Khak-zand, M., & Aghabozorgi, K. (2013). Measuring the components of urban space quality with a comparative Iranian-Islamic and Western approaches. Journal of Islamic Architecture Research, 2(1), 133-148.
  • Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution (R. Banonna, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
  • Lefebvre, H. (2009). State space, world: Selected essays. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Malone, K. (2015). Children’s rights and the crisis of rapid urbanization: Exploring the United Nations post-2015 sustainable development agenda and the potential role for UNICEF’s Child Friendly Cities Initiative. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 23, 1-20.
  • McAllister, C. A. (2011). Where have all the children gone? Community, nature, and the child-friendly city (Doctoral thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada).
  • Mizrak, B., Mattia, S., & Pandolfi, A. (2014). Spatial child-friendliness in a disadvantaged neighborhood of Istanbul. Research and Teaching Assistant at Yıldız Technical University, Department of Architecture, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • (2016). Indicators for child-friendly local development (I-CHILD). Delhi, India.
  • Peleg, N. (2012). The child’s right to development (PhD thesis, University College London).
  • Purcell, M. (2014). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36, 141-154.
  • Rafieian, M., & Alvandipour, N. (2017). Conceptualizing the idea of the right to the city: In search of a conceptual model. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 16(2), 25-47.
  • Rezvani, A. (2016). The soul of the city: Redefining the city, space, urban space, and determining soulful indicators. Sabz Architecture Quarterly, 2(4), 55-79.
  • Riggio, E. (2018). Child-friendly cities: Good governance in the best interests of the child. Journal of Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 45-58.
  • Sutama, I. M. (2016). Realizing child’s right through child-friendly city initiative in Indonesia. University of Airlangga-Surabaya.
  • White, R. (2004). Adults are from Earth; children are from the Moon: Designing for children: A complex challenge. White Hutchinson Leisure & Learning Group.

  • Receive Date 01 August 2021
  • Revise Date 19 October 2021
  • Accept Date 17 November 2021