Recognition and evaluation of urban spaces base on multimethodology approach (Case Study: 16 European Urban Squares)

Document Type : Case Study


1 Department of City and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

2 Department of Architecture, College of Art and Architecture, West-Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of City Planning, Faculty of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK


Urban design is a multi-level discipline that includes several branches of engineering and design, such as urban planning, urban development, architecture, landscape architecture, transportation, economics, and laws. Public places are places where people go for individual and collective action, and, because of the social nature of mankind, urban squares, as the most important expression of social nodes, represent urban democracy. The traditional assessment of urban space, such as Square, with regard to its specific qualitative dimensions, was more often thought to be a qualitative and general judgment that ultimately encouraged a range of values, such as Likert, or a zero-or-one human psychological property, for the type of content itself. Which generally led to a high error rate due to the quality of the evaluation. The purpose of the current research is to identify the nature of urban space with a phenomenological approach. The research is of a developmental nature, and first, using library resources and considering the collection and analysis of the concepts and categories of the subject of a social node such as cognitive classification square based on a matrix consisting of six cognitive criteria of supply Each of them is also subdivided according to the criteria. According to the cognitive process, 16 of the public spaces in Europe evaluated. Considering the result of the evaluation of the HSE model from the selected squares for analysis, the San Marco of Venice in Italy, with an accumulated numerical quality of 95%, is considered to be the highest European urban square.


Bacon, Edmund N. (1977), Design of Cities, London 1992,
p. 19.
Bahrdt, Hans Paul: Die moderne Großstadt. Sozio-logische
Überlegungen zum Städtebau, Reinbek bei Hamburg
1961, p. 39.
Mumford, Lewi, (1961) The City in History: Its Origins, Its
Transformations, and Its Prospects, San Diego, New York,
London 1989, pp. 114-118.
Sebald, W.G.: Vertigo, New York 2000, p. 52.
Sennett, Richard: The Fall of Public Man, (1974), Cambridge,
London, Melbourne, pp.38-41.
Benjamin, Walter. (1936), ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Its
Technical Reproducibility’, in Benjamin, Walter: Selected
Writings, vol. 3: 1935-1938, Cambridge MA 2006, p. 120.
Burkhardt, Robert, (2014). ‘Ein neuer Realismus’, in Arch+
217, p. 114. R. B. uses a well-known topos of Bruno
Reichlin und Martin Steinmann from the 1970s, which
was introduced by an issue of Archithese equally
called ‘Realismus in der Architektur’, Reichlin, Bruno;
Steinmann, Martin: ‘Zum Problem der innerarchitektonischen
Wirklichkeit’ (About the problem of the intraarchi-
tectonic reality), in Archithese 19, pp. 3-11.
Corbusier, Lecourbier, (1931). Towards a new architecture,
Courier Corporation. pp. 40-43
Deutinger, Theo, (2014). Pedro Rey Antón: ‘Squares’, in
Mark 48 (2014), pp. 44-45.
Fischer-Lichte, Erika: ‘Performativity and Space’,
in Wolfrum, Sophie; von Brandis, Nikolai (eds),
Performative Urbanism, Berlin, p. 35.
Hahn, Achim, (2011). ‘Das Entwer- fen’, in
Architekturtheorie, Vienna 2008, pp. 178-206. https://
Klaus, Hempfer, (2011). Theorien des Performa- tiven.
Sprache - Wissen - Praxis, Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme,
Bielefeld, p. 44.
Hillier, B., Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space.
Cambridge University Press. p. 45. https://doi.
Hoesli, Bernhard, (1968). ‘Transpa-rente Formorganisation
als Mittel des Entwurfes’ (1982), in Colin Rowe and
Robert Slutzky (eds), Transparenz, Zurich, p. 91.
Isaacs, R, (2000). The urban picturesque: an aesthetic
experience of urban pedestrian places. JUrban Des
Janson, Alban, (2014). Tigges, Florian: Fundamental Concepts
of Architecture: The Vocabulary of Spatial Situations,
Basel, p. 285.
Jiang, B., Claramunt, C, (2002). Integration of space syntax
into gis: new perspectives for urban morphology.
Trans. GIS. 6(3):295-309.
Lefebvre, Henri, (1974). The Production of Space, Oxford
1992 (La production de l’espace, Paris 1974). p. 211
Maak, Niklas, (2014). ‘Stehen lassen’ in Frankfurter Allgemeine
Sonntagszeitung, 26. 8. 2012, p. 23, as quoted by
Christopher Dell: Das Urbane, Berlin, p. 10.
Carmona, Matthew, (2003). Public Places, Urban Spaces:
The Dimensions of Urban Design, Architectural Press, the
University of Michigan, p 327
Plessner, Helmuth. (1975), Die Stufen des Organischen und
der Mensch, Berlin, New York 1975, 292. https://doi.
Taylor, N. (2009), Legibility and aesthetics in urban
design. J. Urban. Des. 14(2):189-202. https://doi.
Whitehead, M. (1992), The concepts and principles of
equity and health, Int. J. Health. Serv. 22(3):429-45.