International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

Explaining the Conceptual Model of the Effects of Architecture on Epigenetic Changes in Healthy Buildings: A Meta-Analysis Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Fatemeh Rahbari 1
Hadi MahmoudiNejad 2
Gholamhosein Naseri 2
Seyed Mostafa Hosseini 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Architecture, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
2 Assistant professor, Department of Architecture, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran
3 Advisor, Human Genetics Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jumes.2023.1998980.1126
Abstract
Abstract

Access to a healthy life as a fundamental human right underscores the importance of designing healthy buildings. By integrating principles from architecture, medical sciences, and psychology, healthy buildings aim to minimize negative effects on users' health. In a similar vein, epigenetics, which examines environmental factors turning generational genes on or off and affecting gene expression, has shown interest in the impact of architectural spaces on epigenetic changes in individuals over time. Epigenetics aims to identify the dynamic changes in a cell's transcription potential, which may or may not be heritable. Designing a healthy building and its effect on genetic health has been a hotly-debated issue and requires more investigation. This study attempts to understand whether architecture has an effect on genetics, how the effect could be, and what architectural features influence genetics. This descriptive-analytical research employed the Delfi method and content analysis to analyze the data. The ultimate goal of this research is to compile and present the principles of healthy building design from an epigenetic perspective, to leverage architecture as a tool for treating epigenetic diseases in the future. By examining relevant theories, and meta-analyses of existing studies on the effects of environmental architecture on health, genetic, and epigenetic disorders, This study attempts to explain a conceptual framework for the effect of architecture on genetic and epigenetic changes. Future studies and experiments can focus on genetic diseases caused by building architecture.
Keywords
environmental health
gene-environment
genetics
epigenetics
healthy buildings
  • Abdul-Wahab, S. A. (2011). Sick building syndrome. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17919-8
  • Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2007). Molecular biology of the cell (5th ed.). W.W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203833445
  • Assadi, S. N. (2012). Sick building syndrome and diseases related to indoor air pollution. Mashhad: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
  • Azhdehfar, S., Azhdehfar, L., & Omrani Pour, A. (2014). Relation between physical environment of architecture and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders symptom in Tehran children (6-10 years). Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, (6), 141-158.
  • Bahrainy, H. (1995). Healthy cities project of the World Health Organization and the necessity of its serious implementation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Environmental Sciences, No. 17, Publications of Tehran University, 4-14.
  • Baker-Laporte, P., Elliott, E., & Banta, J. (2008). Prescriptions for a healthy house: A practical guide for architects, builders & homeowners. New Society Publishers.
  • Barton, H., Tsourou, C., & Mitcham, C. (2019). Healthy urban planning in practice: Experience of European cities: report of the WHO City Action Group on Healthy Urban Planning. (Translated by Laia Jalilian- Iman Chaghajerdi). Sanjesh & Danesh Publication Co.
  • Berkebile, B., & McLennan, J. (2004). The living building: Biomimicry in architecture, integrating technology with nature. BioInspire, 18.
  • Bluyssen, P. M. (2009). The indoor environment handbook: How to make buildings healthy and comfortable. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774611
  • Bonnes, M., & Secchiaroli, G. (1995). Environmental psychology: A psycho-social introduction. (Translated by C. Montagna). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
  • Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 patterns of biophilic design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green, LLC.
  • Clark, E., & Chatto, C. H. F. (2014). Biophilic design strategies to generate wellness and productivity. National professional conference, April 22-24.
  • Clegg, F. M., Sears, M., Friesen, M., Scarato, T., Metzinger, R., Russell, C., Stadtner, A., & Miller, A. B. (2020). Building science and radiofrequency radiation: What makes smart and healthy buildings. Building and Environment, 176, 106324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106324
  • Emamgholi, A. (2014). Architecture’s impact on health: An idea for “therapeutic architecture.” Journal of Behavioral Sciences, (20), 23-38.
  • Esmaeilzadeh, H., Zahraie, A., Mortazavi, N., & Dastgheib, S.A. (2021). Epigenetic, autoimmune diseases and allergic disease. Journal of Culture and Health Promotion, 5(2), 221-227.
  • Evans, G., & Cohen, S. (2004). Environmental stressors. In Handbook of Environmental Psychology, Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, 1, 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-657410-3/00704-2
  • Fadey, M. O., Alkhaja, K., Sulayem, M. B., & Abu-Hijleh, B. (2014). Evaluation of indoor environmental quality conditions in elementary schools’ classrooms in the United Arab Emirates. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.03.001
  • Francovich, C. (2008). Exploring leadership influence behaviors in the context of behavior settings. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 4(1), 13.
  • Goldstein, W. E. (Ed.). (2010). Sick building syndrome and related illness: Prevention and remediation
  • Ismail, M., & Umar Imam, M. (2021). Chapter 3 - Lifestyle and preventive medical epigenetics. In Translational Epigenetics, Medical Epigenetics (Second Edition) (Vol. 29, pp. 33-50). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823928-5.00024-4
  • Papoli-Yazdi, M. H., Sanajerdi, H., & Rajabi, H. (2013). The theory of urban and surrounding (3rd ed.). The Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Humanities (SAMT).
  • Pawlyn, M. (2016). Biomimicry in architecture. RIBA Publishing.
  • Pedersen Zari, M., Connolly, P., & Southcombe, M. (2020). Ecologies design: Transforming architecture, landscape, and urbanism. Routledge Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279904
  • (2005). The Republic (Translated by Fuad Rouhani). Tehran: Science & Culture Publisher.
  • Rahbari, F. (2023). Architectural PhD dissertation, Dameghan Branch. Supervisors: Hadi MahmoudiNejad & GholamHossein Naseri, Islamic Azad University, Dameghan Branch.
  • Rate, H. (2000). Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant complaints. Indoor Air, 10, 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004212.x
  • Shahcheraghi, A., & Bandarabad, A. (2016). Environed in environment: Application of environmental psychology in architecture and urban design. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Publication.
  • Shahroudi, A. A. (2014). Applying brain and neurosciences in improving the quality of architectural space. The Second National Conference of Architecture and Urbanism Over Time, Qazvin, Iran.
  • Shuai, F. (2018). Urban development; imagination of realities (Translated by Habibi, S. M.). Publications of Tehran University, Tehran.
  • Söderlund, J., & Newman, P. (2015). Biophilic architecture: A review of the rationale and outcomes. AIMS Environmental Science, 2(4), 950-969. https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2015.4.950
  • Song, J., Huang, X., Shi, D., Lin, W. E., Fan, S., & Linden, P. F. (2021). Natural ventilation in London: Towards energy-efficient and healthy buildings. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107722
  • Strumse, E. (2014). Psychological perspectives on people and environment. Lillehammer University College, Norway.
  • Swenson, K. (2005). Medical women and Victorian fiction. University of Missouri Press.
  • Tabibian, M. (1997). Evaluating the Health City Project in Iran (Case Study: 13 Aban Neighborhood). Journal of Environmental Studies, (20), 62-65.
  • Tavakoli, A., Vahdat, K., & Keshavarz, M. (2020). Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): An emerging infectious disease in the 21st century. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 22(6), 432-450. https://doi.org/10.29252/ismj.22.6.432
  • Todorovic, M. S., & Tai Kim, J. (2012). Beyond the science and art of healthy buildings: Daylighting dynamic control’s performance prediction and validation. Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.033
  • Wells, M. (2011). Designing for biodiversity: Productivity and profit. Environmental Briefing Note. British Council of Offices.
  • Wilson, E. O. (2010). The diversity of life. Harvard University Press.
  • Woolley, T. (2016). Building materials, health and indoor air quality: No breathing space? Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315677965
  • Xiang, J., Seto, E., Mo, J., Zhang, J. J., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Impacts of implementing Healthy Building guidelines for daily PM2.5 limits on premature deaths and economic losses in urban China: A population-based modeling study. Environment International, 147, 106342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106342

  • Receive Date 11 November 2022
  • Revise Date 08 February 2023
  • Accept Date 28 March 2023