International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

The role of academic performance of universities on sustainability with an emphasis on GreenMetric evaluation components (Case study: Iranian universities)

Document Type : Case Study

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Khorasan Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
In the contemporary context, the imperative to address climate and environmental challenges has prompted universities worldwide to prioritize sustainability in their operational frameworks. Notably, numerous universities in Iran have taken significant strides towards incorporating sustainable practices into their academic systems. This research endeavors to scrutinize the nexus between the scientific and environmental performances of universities in Iran, posing the fundamental question: "Is there a discernible relationship between sustainability and academic performance in universities?" To investigate this, data from five university ranking systems were aggregated. Employing linear regression analysis, the study aimed to elucidate the correlation between sustainability and scientific performance. The ensuing results were juxtaposed against analogous research studies conducted previously. The findings indicate that the GreenMetric ranking system exhibits a minimal correlation with ARWU (R2=0.034) and THE (R2=0.0278). This is attributed to the predominant focus of these systems on quantitative metrics such as the volume of studies, references, and scholarly contributions. In contrast, a more substantial correlation was observed with QS (R2=0.2282). Intriguingly, NTU displayed a stronger correlation with the GreenMetric ranking system (R2=0.2562), albeit in a negative direction. In summation, the research posits that the scientific performance of universities in Iran may not necessarily reflect their environmental performance. This discrepancy is elucidated by the nuanced impact of factors such as the geographical location, age, and historical context of a university, which emerge as pivotal determinants influencing both scientific and environmental rankings. Consequently, any comprehensive assessment in this realm necessitates a nuanced consideration of these contextual variables.
Keywords

  • Academic Rankings of World Universities. (2012). Academic Ranking of World Universities. Shanghai Rankings.
  • Atici, K. B., Yasayacak, G., Yildiz, Y., & Ulucan, A. (2021). Green university and academic performance: An empirical study on UI GreenMetric and world university rankings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125289
  • Australia/Pacific SDSN. (2017). Getting started with the SDGs in universities: A guide for universities, higher education institutions and the academic sector. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
  • Bautista-Puig, N., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2021). Sustainability practices in Spanish higher education institutions: An overview of status and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126320
  • Boer, P. (2013). Assessing sustainability and social responsibility in higher education assessment frameworks explained. In Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions: Mapping trends and good practices around the worldhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02375-5_7
  • Clugston, R. R. M., & Calder, W. (2000). Critical dimensions of sustainability in higher education. Sustainability and University Life.
  • Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U. M., & Leal Filho, W. (2013). Sustainability science and education for sustainable development in universities: A way for transition. In Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions: Mapping trends and good practices around the worldhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02375-5_1
  • Fuentes, J. E., Garcia, C. E., & Olaya, R. A. (2022). Estimation of the setting and infrastructure criterion of the UI GreenMetric ranking using unmanned aerial vehicles. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010046
  • Hazelkorn, E. (2013). World-class universities or world-class systems? Rankings and higher education policy choices. UNESCO Forum on Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education, May, 1–23.
  • Khan, S., & Henderson, C. (2020). How Western Michigan University is approaching its commitment to sustainability through sustainability-focused courses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119741
  • Lauder, A., Sari, R. F., Suwartha, N., & Tjahjono, G. (2015). Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: GreenMetric. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.080
  • Leon, I., Oregi, X., & Marieta, C. (2020). Contribution of university to environmental energy sustainability in the city. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030774
  • Marcolini, J. P. (2017). Curricula for sustainability in higher education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/86
  • Muñoz-Suárez, M., Guadalajara, N., & Osca, J. M. (2020). A comparative analysis between global university rankings and environmental sustainability of universities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145759
  • Nazarpoor, M. (2016). Report on green management practices in universities, higher education research centers and science and technology parks. General Office of Development Supervision.
  • Polytechnique, E. (2013). 2011 performance ranking of scientific papers for world universities. National Taiwan University. https://doi.org/http://nturanking.lis.ntu.edu.tw
  • Pope, J., Annandale, D., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2004). Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001
  • QS World University Rankings. (2016). QS top universities. QS World University Rankings.
  • Sart, G. (2023). Sustainable campus design in universities. In Considerations on education for economic, social, and environmental sustainability(pp. 121–135). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8356-5.ch006
  • Shriberg, M. (2005). Assessing sustainability: Criteria, tools, and implications. In Higher education and the challenge of sustainability(pp. 71–86). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48515-x_6
  • Times Higher Education. (2022). World university rankings 2022. Times Higher Education.
  • Universitas Indonesia. (2021). Guidelines of UI GreenMetric World University Ranking.
  • Yadegaridehkordi, E., & Nilashi, M. (2022). Moving towards green university: A method of analysis based on multi-criteria decision-making approach to assess sustainability indicators. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(9), 8207–8230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04086-y
  • Yuan, X., Zuo, J., & Huisingh, D. (2013). Green universities in China - What matters? Journal of Cleaner Production, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.030
Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
Spring 2024
Pages 110-123

  • Receive Date 25 November 2023
  • Revise Date 24 February 2024
  • Accept Date 16 April 2024