International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

Explanation of indicators affecting the improvement of indoor air quality in central courtyard houses in a hot and humid climate, emphasizing the concept of natural ventilation using the fuzzy Delphi method

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Architecture, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning and Architecture, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.
Abstract
Houses located in hot and humid climates, such as those in Iran, greatly benefit from having a central courtyard, which fulfills both functional and aesthetic roles. The incorporation of natural ventilation, particularly through central courtyards, is acknowledged as an effective method for enhancing indoor air quality while reducing energy consumption. By strategically situating windows and openings around the courtyard, architects can utilize prevailing wind patterns, thereby facilitating the movement of fresh air throughout the living spaces. This study employs a descriptive-analytical approach with a focus on development, particularly in elucidating the theoretical foundations, proposed models, and frameworks relevant to this topic. Following a thorough examination of theoretical foundations and a review of the existing literature, alongside an emphasis on clearly defining objectives without redundancy, key factors were identified. These were derived from the research framework and were validated through the Delphi method, resulting in a model of final indicators. The findings indicate that experts and stakeholders identified the size of the courtyard, the number and configuration of rooms, and the design of the roof as the most significant factors affecting indoor air quality in central courtyard houses. These elements received high average scores of 4.30, 4.28, and 4.27, respectively, underscoring their impact on promoting natural ventilation. Future research may focus on exploring the interrelationships among these indicators in specific case studies, allowing for broader generalization of the results.

Graphical Abstract

Explanation of indicators affecting the improvement of indoor air quality in central courtyard houses in a hot and humid climate, emphasizing the concept of natural ventilation using the fuzzy Delphi method

Highlights

  • The study analyzes the impact of central courtyard proportions on ventilation flow.
  • Airflow and ventilation efficiency differ significantly between ground and first floors.
  • Elongation along prevailing winds enhances ventilation efficiency.
  • Future research should examine socio-cultural aspects of traditional courtyard housing.

Keywords

  • Alawneh, A., Jarrar, M., & Al-Mdallal, Q. (2019). The applicability of fuzzy Delphi method in assessing the sustainable building materials: A case study from Jordan. Sustainability, 11(13), 3713. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133713
  • Basu, R., & Khanna, I. (2023). Innovative designs for sustainable passive cooling in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 167, 112712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112712
  • Chan, Y. W., Ho, K. K. S., & Ng, W. (2010). The Delphi technique in the social sciences: A formative approach in public policy. Social Research, 77(4), 1517-1536. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2010.0059
  • Deng, H. (2011). The fuzzy Delphi method based on the fuzzy set theory and its applications. Operations Research Letters, 39(4), 257-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2011.04.004
  • Gao, H., Gu, M., & Liu, J. (2021). The fuzzy Delphi method and its application in identifying key factors for zero carbon buildings. Energy Reports, 7, 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.046
  • Harrison, P. A., & Lee, L. (2022). The role of natural light in residential buildings: A review of energy savings and indoor well-being. Energy and Buildings, 256, 111794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111794
  • Hsu, C. H., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7275/5y2x-8c45
  • Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Andrew, S. (2019). The role of the fuzzy Delphi method in assessing the performance of sustainable buildings. Journal of Building Performance, 10(3), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.21834/jbp.v10i3.244
  • Klepeis, N. E., Nelson, W. C., Ott, W. R., Robinson, J. P., Tsang, A., & Switzer, P. (2022). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for researchers. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 12(6), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00357-z
  • Malekzadeh, M., Amiri, M., & Azhdari, L. (2022). Exploring zero carbon construction challenges through expert opinions: A fuzzy Delphi method approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 78, 103949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103949
  • Manoliadis, O. K., Labropoulos, N. K., & Tragakis, S. D. (2006). The use of the Delphi method in the evaluation of the sustainable development indicators. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(3), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.006
  • Miller, W. A., Hargreaves, K., & Jones, K. M. (2023). The impact of building orientation on natural light and thermal comfort in residential design. Building and Environment, 226, 109789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109789
  • O'Connor, P. J. (2023). The role of water features in enhancing urban ecosystems and promoting comfort in residential designs. Sustainable Cities and Society, 84, 104098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104098
  • Shi, G., He, Z., Wang, Y., & Yu, Y. (2015). The Role of the Delphi Method in Assessing Key Indicators for Sustainable Development: A Case Study Analysis. Sustainable Development, 23(2), 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1646
  • Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Väänänen, H., & Yli-Pelkonen, V. (2023). Promoting ecosystem services through urban green spaces: A systematic review. Ecological Indicators, 129, 107949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107949
  • Zarghami, R., Ahamd, M., Kafi, M., & Mohamad, N. (2019). The Delphi method in the formulation of policies for sustainable development: A systematic review. Sustainability, 11(5), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051234
  • Zasepa, A. Y., O'Connor, P. J., & Filatova, T. (2023). Integrated approaches to urban environmental design: Enhancing human experiences and sustainability. Journal of Urban Design, 28(1), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2022.2042034
  • Zheng, S., Huang, J., & Wang, L. (2022). Applying the fuzzy Delphi method to enhance the indoor air quality in naturally ventilated buildings: Evidence from case studies. Building and Environment, 207, 108339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108339

  • Receive Date 12 December 2024
  • Revise Date 01 March 2025
  • Accept Date 20 March 2025