International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

Presenting a conceptual model in architectural design education, considering the effective factors of activism

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD researcher in Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Activism, as a fundamental concept in various disciplines, particularly architecture, refers to designers’ sensitivity to social, political, economic, and environmental conditions. This awareness encourages designers to focus more on these elements in their design processes. Nevertheless, a primary challenge in architectural education is the ineffective transmission of activism-related concepts to students. In many curricula, discussions on activism are often unproductive and oversimplified.This research is divided into two main sections. The first section examines key resources in architectural education and activism, analyzing the perspectives of influential thinkers. The second section presents a conceptual model developed through data collection from experts, aimed at enhancing the educational process in architectural design. This model seeks to identify and strengthen factors crucial for teaching activism.It is anticipated that the findings will contribute to optimizing university curricula. Finally, suggestions for future research on activism in architectural education will be proposed.

Graphical Abstract

Presenting a conceptual model in architectural design education, considering the effective factors of activism

Highlights

  • Forty activism-related factors in architectural education were identified and classified into four categories: individual, social, educational system, and infrastructure
  • Top-rated factors by experts included:
    • Interdisciplinary studies (Q18)
    • Understanding social phenomena (Q38)
    • Understanding cultural phenomena (Q37)
      (All with average scores above 4.6)
  • Strongest correlation was found between active design strategies (Q11) and interdisciplinary studies (Q18), with a Pearson correlation of 0.812, indicating their combined importance in model design.
  • Most influential factors in teaching activism (based on regression analysis) were:
    • Creating a sense of experience (Q14)
    • Questioning skills (Q2)
    • Performance evaluation (Q16)
    • Creative learning environment (Q31)
    • Role of studio space (Q33)
      These became the core variables of the final conceptual model.

Keywords

  • Arash, A. N., Mohsen, K., & Sirous, B. (2022). Social factors influencing the performance of architecture graduates. Socio-Cultural Strategy, 11(2), 529-559.
  • Azadkhani, P. (2022). The impact of modern construction technology in improving the quality of the architectural environment of sustainable educational buildings. International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability, 3(4), 11-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.22034/jumes.2022.1986028.1109
  • Bieling, T. (2021). 6 DESIGN AND THE POLITICS OF THE EVERYDAY. Design & Democracy: Activist Thoughts and Examples for Political Empowerment, 73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035622836-009
  • Borazjani, N. (2009). The relationship between questioning and architectural education. Art, 1(1), 52-59.
  • Cammaerts, B. (2015). Social media and activism. Journalism, 1027-1034.
  • Campana, A. (2011). Agents of possibility: Examining the intersections of art, education, and activism in communities. Studies in Art Education, 52(4), 278-291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2011.11518841
  • ÇETİN, Ö. D., & ARYANA, B. (2015). An analysis of the influence of design activism and socially responsible design approaches on design education. The value of design research, 1-11.
  • CHEN, Y. D. ACTIVISM IN DESIGN.
  • Corazzo, J. (2019). Materialising the Studio. A systematic review of the role of the material space of the studio in Art, Design and Architecture Education. The Design Journal, 22(sup1), 1249-1265.
  • Costa, A. L., Vaz, H., & Menezes, I. (2021). The Activist Craft: Learning Processes and Outcomes of Professional Activism. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(3), 211-231. doi:10.1177/0741713620988255
  • Crysler, C. G. The Paradoxes of Design Activism: Expertise, Scale and Exchange Part Two: Scale: FIELD.
  • Crysler, C. G. (2015). The paradoxes of design activism: Expertise, scale and exchange. Field–A Journal of Socially Engaged Art Criticism, 77-124.
  • Dasht-e-Gard, Bazrafkan, Kaweh, Jahanbakhsh, & Haider. (2021). Building an architectural education model based on the role of interdisciplinary education. Karafen Quarterly Scientific Journal, 18(Special Issue 1), 95-112.
  • (1991). Design Industries, Architecture Manufacturing A Model for Architectural Design Two-Step Model Theory. sofeh, 1(2), 18-29.
  • Farhi, J., Maedeh, Panahi, & Siamak. (2021). Developing a comprehensive model of the participatory design process in student-centered educational centers. Architecture, restoration and urban planning of Raf, 3(1), 25-40.
  • Fiorito, J., Padavic, I., & DeOrtentiis, P. S. (2015). Reconsidering union activism and its meaning. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53(3), 556-579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12054
  • Fuad-Luke, A. (2013). Design activism: beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world: Routledge.
  • Ghaempanah, M., Memarian, G., & Mohammadmoradi, A. (2024). Explaining social injustices in architectural education in Iran based on critical pedagogy theory . . Arman Shahr Architecture and Urban Development,, 16(45), 147-160. doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2023.320221.2595
  • GORJI MAHLABANI, Y. (2010). TODAY’S ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION AND THE FUTURE CONCERNS  JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY OF EDUCATION 4(3), 223-234.
  • Haghighi, F. A., Fahimeh Sadat, Parasteh Ghambovani, Hassanpour Rudbarki, & Ma’aref Vand. (2023). Investigating the impact of facilitation techniques on student participation in the learning process. Quarterly Journal of Excellence in Education and Training,, 1(2), 46-72. doi: https://doi.org/20.1001.1.2821269.1401.1.2.3.6
  • Hodson, D. (2014). Becoming part of the solution: Learning about activism, learning through activism, learning from activism. Activist science and technology education, 67-98.
  • Hosseini, Sadat, Falamaki, Mansour, M., & hojat. (2019). The role of creative thinking and learning styles in architectural design education. Scientific Journal of Architectural Thought, 3(5), 125-140(115 pages). doi:https://doi.org/10.30479/at.2019.10249.1133
  • Jamshidi, F., Ziari, Y., Zarabadii, Z., & Bahmanpour, H. (2023). Local model of urban green infrastructure in the direction of sustainability in the urban complex of Tehran city. International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability, 4(4), 125-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.22034/jumes.2024.2016822.1184
  • Julier, G. (2011). Political economies of design activism and the public sector. Nordes(4).
  • Julier, G. (2015). From Design Culture to Design Activism. Design and Culture, 5(2), 215-236. doi:10.2752/175470813x13638640370814
  • Karslı, U. T., & Özker, S. (2014). The contributions of workshops on formal interior architecture education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 47-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.152
  • Kaun, A., & Uldam, J. (2018). Digital activism: After the hype. New media & society, 20(6), 2099-2106.
  • Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285-306. doi:https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
  • La Fortuna, L. (2015). Italian design and democracy. JOMEC Journal(8). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18573/j.2015.10031
  • Markussen, T. (2020). Politics of design activism: From impure politics to parapolitics Design and Political Dissent (pp. 171-183): Routledge.
  • Mehdi, K. Z., Farhang, M., & Mohsen, F. (2010). Visual analogy and its place in creative education of architectural design.
  • Milan, S. (2017). Data activism as the new frontier of media activism Media activism in the digital age (pp. 151-163): Routledge.
  • Nazir, H., & Abro, S. Technological Skills Implications: Identification of the Gap Between Architectural Education Curricula and Practices in Architecture Firms in Pakistan.
  • Nejad, E. M. J. M., & Mahdavi, E. M. J. (2005). Teaching architectural critivism. beaux arts, 23(23).
  • Qaempanah, memarian, & Moradi, M. (2024). Explaining social injustices in Iranian architectural education based on the theory of critical education. Architecture and Urban Planning of Armanshahr, 16(45), 147-160.
  • Rasouli Amin, M., Khanzadi, K., Ahmadi, F., & Abdoli Sejzi, A. (2024). Personal Development Coaching of Lecturers in Academical System (Case Study: Islamic Azad University in Iran). International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability, 5(4), 88-104.
  • Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices: CRC press.
  • shabak, m., & behnamiri, s. h. (2023). The role of service-based learning in architectural design training workshops.
  • Shelley, C. (2017). Springer.
  • Shelley, C., & Shelley, C. (2017). Activism. Design and Society: Social Issues in Technological Design, 125-137.
  • Song, D., & Lou, Y. (2016). Design Activism.
  • Subasinghe, C. (2024). Tales on Soles: driving design via Design Activism. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 53-74.
  • Svirsky, M. (2010). Defining activism. Deleuze Studies, 4(supplement), 163-182.
  • Taghizadeh, Mohammad, & Aminzadeh. (2002). The impact of research bottlenecks on architecture and urban planning education. Iranian Engineering Education Quarterly Journal, 4(14), 47-75.
  • Taneri, B., & Dogan, F. (2021). How to learn to be creative in design: Architecture students’ perceptions of design, design process, design learning, and their transformations throughout their education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100781.
  • Thorpe, A. (2012). Architecture & design versus consumerism: How design activism confronts growth: Routledge.

  • Receive Date 10 December 2024
  • Revise Date 31 May 2025
  • Accept Date 02 July 2025