International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

Evaluating Urban Vulnerabilities and Post-Earthquake Recovery Seismic Resilience of Qarchak City

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Civil Engineering, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Qarchak city, undergoing rapid and often unregulated urban growth, faces significant seismic risk due to outdated infrastructure and poor compliance with contemporary seismic standards. This study aims to evaluate the city’s seismic resilience by identifying its most vulnerable urban components and assessing its post-earthquake recovery potential. A combined methodology using SELENA software and GIS tools was employed to analyze seismic vulnerability based on building typologies, population density, soil conditions, and land-use zoning. Risk assessments were aligned with the Iranian Seismic Code to estimate potential casualties and economic damages. The results indicate that Region 1 of Qarchak city is the most vulnerable due to its high structural fragility and dense population. Critical weaknesses in urban planning, emergency preparedness, and regulatory enforcement were identified as key contributors to the city’s heightened seismic risk. The study underscores the urgent need for urban resilience strategies, including infrastructure retrofitting, stricter enforcement of seismic codes, and enhanced community awareness. These findings offer practical insights for urban planners and policymakers. Future studies could explore dynamic modeling of post-disaster recovery scenarios and community-based risk reduction strategies.

Graphical Abstract

Evaluating Urban Vulnerabilities and Post-Earthquake Recovery Seismic Resilience of Qarchak City

Highlights

  • The study identifies Region 1 of Qarchak city as the most vulnerable due to its high structural fragility and dense population.
  • A combined methodology using SELENA software and GIS tools was employed to analyze seismic vulnerability based on building typologies, population density, soil conditions, and land-use zoning.
  • Risk assessments aligned with the Iranian Seismic Code estimate potential casualties and economic damages, revealing critical weaknesses in urban planning, emergency preparedness, and regulatory enforcement.
  • The findings emphasize the urgent need for urban resilience strategies, including infrastructure retrofitting, stricter enforcement of seismic codes, and enhanced community awareness.
  • Future work suggests dynamic modeling of post-disaster recovery scenarios and community-based risk reduction strategies to support planners and policymakers.

Keywords

·         An, L.; Zhang, J.; 2022; Impact of urbanization on seismic risk: a study based on remote sensing data; Sustainability; 14(10): 6132. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6132
·         BHRC; 2005; Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, standard no. 2800, third revision; Building and Housing Research Center; Tehran, Iran.
·   Bruneau, M.; Chang, S. E.; Eguchi, R. T.; Lee, G. C.; O’Rourke, T. D.; Reinhorn, A. M.; Shinozuka, M.; Tierney, K.; Wallace, W. A.; von Winterfeldt, D.; 2003; A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities; Earthquake Spectra; 19(4): 733–752. https://chooser.crossref.org/?doi=10.1193%2F1.1623497
·         Cimellaro, P.; 2016; Urban resilience for emergency response and recovery; Springer International Publishing.
·         Erdik, M.; Fahjan, Y.; Ozel, O.; Alcik, H.; Others; 2003; Istanbul earthquake rapid response and the early warning system; Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering; 1(1): 157–163. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024813612271
·         Fang, D. P.; Li, Z. S.; Li, N.; Han, L. H.; Wu, J. P.; Lu, X. Z.; Kong, X. M.; Li, Y.; 2017; Urban resilience: a perspective of system of systems in trio spaces; China Civil Engineering Journal; 50(07): 1-7.
·         Fatemi, A.; Tabrizian, Z.; Ghodrati Amiri, G.; Razavian Amrei, S.; 2013; Earthquake vulnerability and seismic risk assessment of Bandar Abbas in the south of Iran; Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering; 1(1): 1-14. https://civiljournal.semnan.ac.ir/article_1.html/doi: 10.22075/jrce.2013.1
·         Ghodrati Amiri, G.; Razavian Amrei, S. A.; Razavian Amrei, S. A.; 2018; Development of PGA attenuation relationships for Iran; Journal of Modeling in Engineering; 16(54): 167-175. https://modelling.semnan.ac.ir/article_3391.html?lang=en/ doi: 10.22075/jme.2017.4629.
·  Hlal, M.; Azmi, R.; Chenal, J.; Diop, E.; Adraoui, M.; Abdem, S.; Serbouti, I.; Bounabi, M.; 2024; Earthquake risks assessment and urban vulnerability: case of Nador city, northeast Morocco; Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development; 8(14): 9381.   https://qjma.atu.ac.ir/article_17440_f433160f022959e96c53a5fbfa2a97c4.pdf
·         Jia, S.; Zhan, D.-J.; 2024; Quantitative method for seismic resilience assessment of individual buildings; Structures; 64: 106588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106588
·         Keller, E. A.; Blodgett, R. H.; 2022; Natural disasters: a primer on seismic risks.
·         Mansouri, B.; Hosseini, M.; Zare, M.; 2022; Assessment of seismic vulnerability in urban areas using GIS and SELENA software: a case study of Tehran; Natural Hazards; 113(2): 1789–1805.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05147-9
·         Molina, S.; Lang, D. H.; Lindholm, C. D.; 2010; SELENA – an open-source tool for seismic risk and loss assessment using a logic tree computation procedure.
·         Motlagh, Z. S.; Dehkordi, M. R.; Eghbali, M.; Samadian, D.; 2020; Evaluation of seismic resilience index for typical RC school buildings considering carbonate corrosion effects; International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction; 46: 101511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101511
·         Plevris, V.; 2024; AI-driven innovations in earthquake risk mitigation: a future-focused perspective; Geosciences; 14(9): 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14090244.
·         Rashidinia, V.; Razavian Amrei, S. A.; Ghodrati Amiri, G.; 2016; Seismic vulnerability of Yazd; Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering; 3(1): 5-13.
·         Razavian Amrei, S. A.; Alidoost Abadikhah, F.; Jafari, R.; 2018; Seismic risk assessment of Hamedan city; Journal of Modeling in Engineering; 16(55): 247-266. https://modelling.semnan.ac.ir/article_3474.html?lang=en/doi: 10.22075/jme.2018.10978.1057
·         Razavian Amrei, S. A.; Eskandar Shoorkabi, M.; Goodarzi, G.; 2021; Seismic sustainability-assessment of Lavasan city; International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability; 2(4): 31-38. https://www.ijumes.com/article_249508.html/doi: 10.22034/jumes.2021.249508
·         Razavian Amrei, S. A.; Ghodrati Amiri, G.; Zeinali Rastabi, S.; 2015; Seismic risk assessment of Shahrekord; Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering; 1(1): 19-26.  https://www.jsce.ir/article_38596.html?lang=en
·         Razavian Amrei, S. A.; Goodarzi, G.; Esmaeilpour Zanjani, N.; 2024; Analysis of seismic risk and vulnerability of the historical context of Tehran with emphasis on resilience zoning; In: Gervasi, O.; Murgante, B.; Garau, C.; Taniar, D.; Rocha, A. M. A.; Faginas Lago, M. N. (eds) Computational science   and its applications – ICCSA 2024 workshops; ICCSA 2024; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 14820; Springer, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65285-1_16
·         Urlainis, A.; Shohet, I. M.; 2023; A comprehensive approach to earthquake-resilient infrastructure: integrating maintenance with seismic fragility curves; Buildings; 13(9): 2265.  https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092265.
·         USGS (United States Geological Survey). (2023). Earthquake Hazards Program.
·         Van Westen, C. J.; Montoya, L.; Boerboom, L.; 2002; Multi-hazard risk assessment using GIS in urban areas: a case study for the city of Turrialba, Costa Rica; University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC).
·         Yildirim, A. K.; Kavus, B. Y.; Karaca, T. K.; 2024; A novel seismic vulnerability assessment for the urban roadway by using interval valued fermatean fuzzy analytical hierarchy process; Natural Hazards.

  • Receive Date 28 January 2025
  • Revise Date 02 June 2025
  • Accept Date 23 July 2025