Evaluating Financial and Operational Challenges in the Replacement of Smart Materials in High-Density Projects (Case Study of Mehr Housing in Hamedan)

Sadeghi Fereshteh, Roya

doi:10.22034/ijumes.2025.2056755.1304

Evaluating Financial and Operational Challenges in the Replacement of Smart Materials in High-Density Projects (Case Study of Mehr Housing in Hamedan)

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Roya Sadeghi Fereshteh

Department of Architecture, Faculty of Dr. Ali Eqbali Sustainable Development, University College of Omran_Toseeh, Hamedan, Iran

10.22034/ijumes.2025.2056755.1304

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of smart materials in construction signifies a pivotal shift towards enhancing building performance and sustainability, particularly in high-density projects where operational complexities abound. This research examines the financial and operational barriers encountered in the replacement of traditional materials with smart alternatives, focusing on the Mehr Housing Project in Hamadan, Iran. Utilizing a mixed-methods methodology, comprising a literature review, questionnaires, and structured interviews with key stakeholders—including contractors, project managers, and industry experts—the study identifies critical challenges, such as high initial costs, resistance from contractors, and a lack of specialized expertise in smart materials. The findings highlight that while the potential benefits of smart materials are substantial, their adoption is stymied by both economic and logistical hurdles. To address these challenges, the study proposes targeted solutions including the introduction of financial incentives to offset initial expenditures and a robust framework for training and capacity building among the workforce. By fostering an environment conducive to the integration of smart materials, this research aims to inform policymakers and practitioners on strategies crucial for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of high-density construction projects. Ultimately, the findings advocate for a transformative approach that aligns technological innovation with project management practices to optimize resource utilization and project outcomes in the built environment.

Graphical Abstract

Evaluating Financial and Operational Challenges in the Replacement of Smart Materials in High-Density Projects (Case Study of Mehr Housing in Hamedan)

Highlights

· High initial costs for smart materials compared to traditional alternatives.

· Long-term reduction in operational costs can be overshadowed by upfront investment requirements.

· The research emphasizes the need for transformative strategies that align technological innovations with project management practices.

· Smart materials are identified as a critical pathway to achieving better productivity and sustainable development goals in construction.

· The Mehr Housing Project serves as a pivotal case study for exploring the broader impacts of smart materials in high-density urban projects, providing valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners.

· Effective project management is vital for integrating smart materials, with a focus on quality, scheduling, and cost management to realize substantive benefits.

· The success of projects like the Mehr Housing initiative can significantly influence future practices in urban construction, urging the exploration of innovative solutions to existing challenges.

· A structured approach to project management and material selection is essential for enhancing the performance and sustainability of large-scale construction projects.

Keywords

Built environment

Hamedan

project management

smart materials

smartization technology

· Addington, D. M., & Schodek, D. L. (2005). Smart materials and technologies for the architecture and design professions. Architectural Press/Elsevier.

· Akbarian, M. R., & Salgi, K. (2012). Smart materials and their role in interactive architecture. 9th National Conference on Modern Studies and Research in the Field of Geography, Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran, Tehran.

· De Belie, N., Gruyaert, E., & Van Tittelboom, K. (2020). Self-healing concrete: Mechanisms and applications in construction. Construction and Building Materials, 265, 120406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120406

· Gorji, Y., & Haj Abutalebi, E. (2009). Smart materials and their role in architecture. Quarterly Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 28 (127).

· Hosseini, S., Zhang, Y., & Wang, T. (2022). Phase-changing polymers for sustainable building design: A review on applications and challenges. Journal of Sustainable Materials, 18 (3), 45–67.

· Khanvardi, Y., & Borzo Esfahani, A. (2012). Application of smart materials in sustainable and environmentally friendly buildings. Second International Conference on Civil Engineering, Urban Planning, Architecture and Environment.

· Li, J., Wang, H., & Chen, Z. (2021). Lifecycle cost analysis of smart materials in urban infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Economics, 40 (5), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/yyyy

· Lu, W., Yuan, H., Li, J., Hao, J. J., Mi, X., & Ding, Z. (2011). An empirical investigation of construction and demolition waste generation rates in Shenzhen city, South China. Waste Management, 31, 680–687.

· Menegaki, M., & Damigos, D. (2018). A review on current situation and challenges of construction and demolition waste management. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry.

· Musa, M. F., Yusof, M. R., Mohammad, M. F., & Samsudin. (2016). Towards the adoption of modular construction and prefabrication in the construction environment: A case study in Malaysia. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8122-8131.

· Neuroject Research Group. (2024). Workforce readiness for smart material integration: A survey of global construction firms. International Journal of Construction Management, 22 (1), 67–89.

· Nouri, P., & Safi, M. (2016). Optimal design of using smart materials in shear walls of different floors for seismic improvement of reinforced concrete buildings. Quarterly Journal of Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, 6 (4).

· Pendlebury, J. (2009). Conservation in the age of consensus. Routledge.

· Rasouli, O. (2012). A review of the structural sustainability of construction projects through the use of smart materials. Sixth International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Planning, Tehran.

· Rooney, C., Patel, D., & Singh, R. (2024). Cost-effective production methods for smart materials: Challenges and opportunities. Materials Science Advances, 35 (2), 89–102.

· Saadati, M., Sajjadzadeh, H., & Kamewa, S. (2019). The effect of smart materials (nanotechnology) with emphasis on reducing energy consumption in the construction industry. Quarterly Journal of Mechanical and Vibration Engineering, 10(1).

· Smith, L., & Davis, M. (2023). Regulatory frameworks for adaptive building technologies: A global perspective. Urban Planning Review, 50 (3), 234–256.

· Tiesdell, S., Oc, T., & Heath, T. (2007). Revitalizing historic urban quarters. Architectural Press.