International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

International Journal of Urban Management and Energy Sustainability

Evolution in the Figure-Ground Relationship of Public-Government Buildings in the First Pahlavi Period (Case Studies: The Museum of Ancient Iran and the Post Office Building, Tehran)

Document Type : Case Study

Authors
1 Department of Architecture, Ha.C., Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
3 Department of Urban Planning, ST.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The rapid urban modernization developments during the first Pahlavi era, breaking away from historical patterns, transformed the physical appearance of Tehran in an unprecedented way. In the meantime, modern public buildings, as symbols of modernity, played a pivotal role in redefining the spatial organization of the city. One of the prominent manifestations of this transformation is the change in the figure-ground relationship of buildings with their urban context. The research method is a combined approach based on a comparative approach and a case study in three basic steps: identifying public government buildings built in a specific time period; analyzing the spatial configuration and evaluating the degree of physical-functional adaptation and the relationship of spatial structure with functional logic. This research aims to reveal the hidden logic of spatial organization of modernization projects, and provides an analytical framework for evaluating the physical-social effects of landmark buildings in historical contexts. The study was conducted using space syntax analysis methods, figure-ground analysis, and historical and field documentation of the sites, and in this regard, Depth-Map software was used to analyze the spatial configuration and impact of public buildings during the reform period. The findings and conclusions show that the construction of public and government buildings during the first Pahlavi period led to the strengthening of macro-connectivity in the urban context, and the increase in local connectivity and high connectivity, the continuation of cohesion and dynamism at the micro-scale are clearly visible.

Graphical Abstract

Evolution in the Figure-Ground Relationship of Public-Government Buildings in the First Pahlavi Period (Case Studies: The Museum of Ancient Iran and the Post Office Building, Tehran)

Highlights

  • The rapid urban modernization during the first Pahlavi era redefined Tehran’s physical appearance and the city’s spatial organization, with modern public buildings serving as pivotal symbols of modernity.
  • A key manifestation of this transformation is the shift in the figure-ground relationship between buildings and their urban context.
  • The study employs a combined methodology—space syntax analysis, figure-ground analysis, and historical/field documentation—implemented in three steps: identifying-era public government buildings, analyzing spatial configuration, and evaluating physical-functional adaptation.
  • Depth-Map software is used to analyze the spatial configuration and assess the impact of landmark public buildings on Tehran’s modernization, revealing the urban effects within the historical context.
  • Findings indicate that construction of public/government buildings during the first Pahlavi period strengthened macro-connectivity and elevated local and high connectivity, while maintaining micro-scale cohesion and dynamism.

Keywords

  • Al-Said, K., Turner, A., Alsideyr, H., & Hiller, B. (2019). Methods of Research in Spatial Arrangement: Computer-aided simulation with an emphasis on the influence of morphology on human behavior in the environment (Environmental psychology in architecture and urban planning). (S. Safari, Trans.). Rasht: Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University Publications.
  • Bani Masood, A. (2012). Contemporary Architecture of Iran in the Quest for Tradition and Modernity. Tehran: Naqsh-e Honar-e Me’mari-ye Qarn.
  • Bemanian, M., & Esfandiari, M. (2016). Typology of semi-open urban spaces in traditional Iranian cities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Landscape.
  • Çetin, A., & Beyhan, Ş. G. (2025). Space Syntax Analysis of Visual Privacy in Residential Buildings Developed Under the Influence of Modernism: A Case study in Isparta. Nexus Network Journal, 1-28
  • Çetin, A., Çelik, E., & Beyhan, Ş. G. (2020). Kentsel Izgara Formunun Kullanıcı Hareketlerine Etkisinin Mekân Dizim Yöntemi ile İncelenmesi Isparta Kafeler Caddesi Örneği. İdealkent, 11(31), 2034-2053.
  • Daniel, V., Shafaei, B., & Servoshiani, S. (2005). Niklai Markov Architecture: A collection of architectural works during Iran’s transformative era. Tehran: Did Publications.
  • Daniel, V., Shafaei, B., & Servoshiani, S. (2015). Architecture of André Gide: A collection of architectural works during Iran’s transformative era. Tehran: Victor Daniel Publications.
  • Didban, M., Pordiehimi, Sh., & Rismanchian, A. (2013). Relationships between “cognitive features” and “spatial configuration” of the artificial environment: An experience in Dezful. Iranian Architecture Studies, 2(4), 37–64.
  • Ghabadian, V. (2015). Typology and theoretical foundations in contemporary Iranian architecture. Tehran: Institute of Architectural Science.
  • Hammad, A., Li, M., & Vrcelj, Z. (2025). Space Syntax Analysis of Gated Communities in Jordan: Examining Urban Connectivity and Social Impact. Sustainability, 17(2), 599.
  • Hillier, B. (2005). The art of place and the science of space. World Architecture, 185, 96-102.
  • Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax.
  • Hillier, B. (2008). Space and spatiality: what the built environment need from social theory. Building research & information, 36(3), 216-230.
  • Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J., & Penn, A. (1986). Creating life: or, does architecture determine anything? Architecture & Comportement/Architecture & Behaviour, 3(3), 233-250.
  • Hillier, B., Hanson, J., & Peponis, J. (1984). What do we mean by building function? E & FN Spon Ltd.
  • Khozaei Ravari, Z., Ul Islam, Q., Khozaei, F., & Choupan Zarvijani, S. B. (2022). Factors that hinder the thesis writing process of non-native MA students in ELT: supervisors' perspectives. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(5), 1325-1336.
  • Lak, A., & Hakimian, P. (2018). A new morphological approach to Iranian bazaar: The application of urban spatial design theories to Shiraz and Kerman bazaars. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 24(3), 207–223.
  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
  • Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. Wiley.
  • Maroufi, H., Bamian, M., & Yeganeh, M. (2024). Spatial behavior dimensions in the formation of living spaces: A case study of Meybod City. Geography Quarterly (Regional Planning), 14(55), 486–504.
  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Relph, E. (1976). Place and place lessness. Pion Publications
  • Shirazian, R. (2016). Tehrano-graphy: A bank of maps and toponyms of old Tehran. Tehran: Dastan Publications.
  • Trancik, R. (1986). Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. John Wiley & Sons
  • Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Turner, A. (2001). Depthmap: a program to perform visibility graph analysis. In Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on space syntax (Vol. 31, pp. 31-12). Atlanta, GA, USA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
  • Turner, S., Sider, P., Pinlo, J., & Khoao, D. (2015). Introduction to Depth Map software. (S. Samavati, S. Mehrabi, M. Mehrabi, & F. Mehrabi, Trans.). Tehran: Shaparak Sorkh Publications.
  • Ünkaracalar, S. S. (2022). Changing urban forms, spatial perceptions, and relations: A spatial urban reading of Sıhhiye, Ankara (Master's thesis, TED University (Turkey).
Volume 6, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
Summer 2025
Pages 200-217

  • Receive Date 12 May 2025
  • Revise Date 22 August 2025
  • Accept Date 26 September 2025