This study analyzes indicators extracted from sociological perspectives on interventions in worn-out urban fabrics to understand how public–private space redefinitions, economic–social function restoration, symbolic meanings, equity in design, and multi-method evaluation collectively shape social cohesion, trust, and neighborhood legitimacy. By synthesizing these indicators, the research identifies how participation quality, accessibility, and inclusive governance influence the durability and fairness of urban improvements in worn-out urban fabrics, while highlighting risks of reproducing inequalities when voices from marginalized groups are underrepresented. The objective is to articulate a coherent analytic framework that connects diverse indicators with concrete social outcomes, offering actionable insights for policymakers, planners, and community stakeholders. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study integrates qualitative insights from participatory processes, interviews, and cultural mapping with quantitative measures of participation rates, resource allocation, and basis for trust proxies, complemented by evaluation metrics that capture changes in everyday practices, such as mutual aid and collaborative decision-making. Findings indicate that successful interventions emerge when access and participation are equitably distributed, local economies and social infrastructures are reinforced through authentic community engagement, and governance structures sustain transparent accountability and continuous feedback. The symbolic framing of spaces and the distribution of resources significantly affect perceived safety, intergroup relations, and overall social capital. Collectively, these dynamics contribute to enhanced social justice and long-term resilience in urban communities, provided that evaluation frameworks are rigorous, iterative, and inclusive, ensuring that benefits accrue to all resident groups.